| Title |
Contrasting patterns of the 5S and 45S rDNA evolutions in the Byblis liniflora complex (Byblidaceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10265-010-0366-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Fukushima, Kaori Imamura, Katsuya Nagano, Yoshikazu Hoshi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| Brazil | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 27% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 75% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#196
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,866
of 94,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them