| Title |
Adalimumab
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioDrugs, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00063030-200418020-00005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynne M. Bang, Gillian M. Keating |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioDrugs
#314
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,331
of 186,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioDrugs
#111
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.