| Title |
Involvement of Jasmonic Acid and Derivatives in Plant Response to Pathogen and Insects and in Fruit Ripening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00344-004-0035-1 |
| Authors |
Hugo Peña-Cortés, Paula Barrios, Fernando Dorta, Victor Polanco, Carolina Sánchez, Elizabeth Sánchez, Ingrid Ramírez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,319,384
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#14
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,169
of 141,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them