| Title |
Symptomatic, radionuclide and therapeutic assessment of chronic idiopathic dyspepsia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, May 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01540334 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Jian, F. Ducrot, A. Ruskone, S. Chaussade, J. C. Rambaud, R. Modigliani, J. D. Rain, J. J. Bernier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,017,235
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#738
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,713
of 14,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.