| Title |
Nanofiber deposition by electroblowing of PVA (polyvinyl alcohol)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-008-3209-6 |
| Authors |
Chang Suk Kong, Wan Suk Yoo, Kui Young Lee, Han Seong Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 6 | 19% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#342
of 5,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,228
of 188,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.