| Title |
Morphological and electrochemical investigation of RuO2–Ta2O5 oxide films prepared by the Pechini–Adams method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10800-008-9506-6 |
| Authors |
Josimar Ribeiro, Michael S. Moats, Adalgisa R. De Andrade |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 20 | 40% |
| Engineering | 7 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,763,732
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#67
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,206
of 159,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.