| Title |
Frequency limitations of the two-point central difference differentiation algorithm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, August 1982
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00387207 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Terry Bahill, Jeffrey S. Kallman, Jon E. Lieberman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 30% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,555,516
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#186
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,975
of 7,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.