↓ Skip to main content

Correlates of rediscovery and the detectability of extinction in mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
wikipedia
20 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlates of rediscovery and the detectability of extinction in mammals
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2010
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.1579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana O. Fisher, Simon P. Blomberg

Abstract

Extinction is difficult to detect, even in well-known taxa such as mammals. Species with long gaps in their sighting records, which might be considered possibly extinct, are often rediscovered. We used data on rediscovery rates of missing mammals to test whether extinction from different causes is equally detectable and to find which traits affect the probability of rediscovery. We find that species affected by habitat loss were much more likely to be misclassified as extinct or to remain missing than those affected by introduced predators and diseases, or overkill, unless they had very restricted distributions. We conclude that extinctions owing to habitat loss are most difficult to detect; hence, impacts of habitat loss on extinction have probably been overestimated, especially relative to introduced species. It is most likely that the highest rates of rediscovery will come from searching for species that have gone missing during the 20th century and have relatively large ranges threatened by habitat loss, rather than from additional effort focused on charismatic missing species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Italy 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 142 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 55%
Environmental Science 39 24%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 12 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,064,921
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,508
of 11,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,241
of 108,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#17
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.