You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Handling of Long Objects in Iterative Improvement of Nonexact Reconstruction in Helical Cone-Beam CT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1109/tmi.2006.876156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Magnusson, Per-Erik Danielsson, Johan Sunnegårdh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,448,088
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#677
of 3,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,554
of 88,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,740 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.