↓ Skip to main content

The function of RNA-binding proteins at the synapse: implications for neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
The function of RNA-binding proteins at the synapse: implications for neurodegeneration
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00018-015-1943-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantelle F. Sephton, Gang Yu

Abstract

The loss of synapses is a central event in neurodegenerative diseases. Synaptic proteins are often associated with disease neuropathology, but their role in synaptic loss is not fully understood. Of the many processes involved in sustaining the integrity of synapses, local protein translation can directly impact synaptic formation, communication, and maintenance. RNA-binding proteins and their association with RNA granules serve to regulate mRNA transportation and translation at synapses and in turn regulate the synapse. Genetic mutations in RNA-binding proteins FUS and TDP-43 have been linked with causing neurodegenerative diseases: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. The observation that mutations in FUS and TDP-43 coincide with changes in RNA granules provides evidence that dysfunction of RNA metabolism may underlie the mechanism of synaptic loss in these diseases. However, we do not know how mutations in RNA-binding proteins would affect RNA granule dynamics and local translation, or if these alterations would cause neurodegeneration. Further investigation into this area will lead to important insights into how disruption of RNA metabolism and local translation at synapses can cause neurodegenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 30%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 27%
Neuroscience 37 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,416,356
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#533
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,268
of 267,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#7
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.