| Title |
Sequential heterotrophic/autotrophic cultivation – An efficient method of producing Chlorella biomass for health food and animal feed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, August 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1007981930676 |
| Authors |
James C. Ogbonna, Hiroyuki Masui, Hideo Tanaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 125 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 23% |
| Researcher | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 45% |
| Engineering | 16 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2009.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#565
of 2,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,263
of 28,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them