↓ Skip to main content

Home and Away: Comparisons of Resource Utilization by a Marine Species in Native and Invaded Habitats

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Home and Away: Comparisons of Resource Utilization by a Marine Species in Native and Invaded Habitats
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1010069327402
Authors

Andrew M. Lohrer, Robert B. Whitlatch, Keiji Wada, Yasuo Fukui

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 64%
Environmental Science 14 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,306
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 41,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.