↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Residual Stresses Induced by Robotized Hammer Peening by the Contour Method

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Mechanics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Residual Stresses Induced by Robotized Hammer Peening by the Contour Method
Published in
Experimental Mechanics, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11340-008-9205-6
Authors

L. Hacini, N. Van Lê, P. Bocher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 31%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 52%
Materials Science 5 12%
Design 1 2%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,556,475
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Mechanics
#79
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,630
of 168,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Mechanics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them