| Title |
Über das Vitamin B12-Bedürfnis phototropher Schwefelbakterien
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, September 1966
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00410246 |
| Authors |
Norbert Pfennig, Klaus Dieter Lippert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 10% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#259
of 3,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them