↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Polyethylene Oxide Compacts as Gastroretentive Delivery Systems

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Polyethylene Oxide Compacts as Gastroretentive Delivery Systems
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, January 2009
DOI 10.1208/s12249-008-9182-1
Authors

Ravichandran Mahalingam, Bhaskara Jasti, Raj Birudaraj, Dimitrios Stefanidis, Robert Killion, Tom Alfredson, Pratap Anne, Xiaoling Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,556,475
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#443
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,908
of 171,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.