↓ Skip to main content

Multi-dimensional particle sizing techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Multi-dimensional particle sizing techniques
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00348-005-1009-1
Authors

Nils Damaschke, Holger Nobach, Thomas I. Nonn, Nikolay Semidetnov, Cameron Tropea

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 30 50%
Physics and Astronomy 9 15%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,821,040
of 23,740,970 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#164
of 1,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,607
of 57,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,740,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.