↓ Skip to main content

Animal Cell Cycles and Their Control

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Biochemistry, June 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Animal Cell Cycles and Their Control
Published in
Annual Review of Biochemistry, June 1992
DOI 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.002301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Norbury, Paul Nurse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 250 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 32%
Student > Master 32 12%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Professor 14 5%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 45 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Chemistry 10 4%
Unspecified 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 49 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Biochemistry
#813
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,607
of 19,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Biochemistry
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.