| Title |
Ligand docking and binding site analysis with PyMOL and Autodock/Vina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-010-9352-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Seeliger, Bert L. de Groot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,853 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| China | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1794 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 322 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 267 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 231 | 12% |
| Researcher | 166 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 88 | 5% |
| Other | 287 | 15% |
| Unknown | 492 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 338 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 330 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 292 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 106 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 3% |
| Other | 198 | 11% |
| Unknown | 534 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,249,934
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#45
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,906
of 105,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.