| Title |
Digital-Particle-Image-Velocimetry (DPIV) in a scanning light-sheet: 3D starting flow around a short cylinder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, August 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00196474 |
| Authors |
Ch. Brücker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 3 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 33% |
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 47 | 63% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,791,680
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#53
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,024
of 24,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.