↓ Skip to main content

An optimal bit complexity randomized distributed MIS algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Distributed Computing, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An optimal bit complexity randomized distributed MIS algorithm
Published in
Distributed Computing, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00446-010-0121-5
Authors

Y. Métivier, J. M. Robson, N. Saheb-Djahromi, A. Zemmari

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 27%
Student > Master 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 67%
Engineering 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Distributed Computing
#24
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,257
of 180,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Distributed Computing
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them