↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of different implementations of MFCC

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computer Science and Technology, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 230)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
408 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of different implementations of MFCC
Published in
Journal of Computer Science and Technology, November 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf02943243
Authors

Fang Zheng, Guoliang Zhang, Zhanjiang Song

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 259 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 103 37%
Engineering 79 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Mathematics 6 2%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 65 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,639,993
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computer Science and Technology
#4
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,698
of 45,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computer Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them