↓ Skip to main content

Lesbian and bisexual women’s interpretations of lesbian and ersatz lesbian pornography

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality & Culture, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Lesbian and bisexual women’s interpretations of lesbian and ersatz lesbian pornography
Published in
Sexuality & Culture, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s12119-005-1005-x
Authors

Todd G. Morrison, Dani Tallack

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 37%
Social Sciences 9 26%
Arts and Humanities 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,469,522
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality & Culture
#245
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,308
of 57,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality & Culture
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.