Title |
Explicit solutions of Fisher's equation for a special wave speed
|
---|---|
Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, November 1979
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02462380 |
Authors |
Mark J. Ablowitz, Anthony Zeppetella |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 9% |
Norway | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 26 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Professor | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 9 | 28% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 22% |
Engineering | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#369
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,618
of 6,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them