↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Compulsivity and Sexual Risk in Gay and Bisexual Men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Sexual Compulsivity and Sexual Risk in Gay and Bisexual Men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9483-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Grov, Jeffrey T. Parsons, David S. Bimbi

Abstract

Much of our understanding of the association between the Sexual Compulsivity Scale (SCS) and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men (MSM) has been limited to samples of HIV positive MSM only. Using data from a community-based survey of gay and bisexual men (n = 1214), this analysis sought to further evaluate the association between the SCS and sexual risk behavior. The SCS was significantly associated with a variety of sexual risk behaviors, including having sex under the influence of club drugs, engaging in unprotected anal sex (receptive or insertive) with partners of the same and/or different HIV serostatus, identity as a barebacker, intentions to have bareback sex, number of recent sex partners, and temptation for unsafe sex. The SCS was also significantly associated with having engaged in a variety of specialized sexual behaviors (i.e., fetishes), many of which can increase HIV transmission risks. Finally, in multivariate analyses, the SCS significantly predicted unprotected sex with a non-main partner even when controlling for race, HIV serostatus, age, identity as a barebacker, and club drug use. These data indicate that the SCS may be able to serve as an indicator to detect HIV-associated sexual risk behavior in community-based samples of gay and bisexual men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 15%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 33%
Social Sciences 36 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,855,562
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,697
of 3,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,486
of 107,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.