↓ Skip to main content

Fibromuscular dysplasia: what the radiologist should know: a pictorial review

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Fibromuscular dysplasia: what the radiologist should know: a pictorial review
Published in
Insights into Imaging, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13244-015-0382-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Varennes, F. Tahon, A. Kastler, S. Grand, F. Thony, J. P. Baguet, O. Detante, E. Touzé, A. Krainik

Abstract

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is an idiopathic, segmentary, non-inflammatory and non-atherosclerotic disease that can affect all layers of both small- and medium-calibre arteries. The prevalence of FMD is estimated between 4 and 6 % in the renal arteries and between 0.3 and 3 % in the cervico-encephalic arteries. FMD most frequently affects the renal, carotid and vertebral arteries, but it can theoretically affect any artery. Radiologists play an important role in the diagnosis of FMD, and good knowledge of FMD's signs will certainly help reduce the delay between the first symptoms and diagnosis. The common string-of-beads aspect is well known, but less common presentations also have to be considered. These less common imaging findings include vascular loops, fusiform vascular ectasia, arterial dissection, aneurysm and subarachnoid haemorrhage. These radiologic presentations should be known by radiologists in order to diagnose possible FMD, particularly when present in young females or when associated with personal or familial hypertension, to reduce the delay between the onset of the first symptom and the final diagnosis. The patients have to be referred to specialised FMD centres for dedicated management. • Fibromuscular dysplasia is not a rare disease. • Radiologists should recognise less common presentations to orient specific management. • Vascular loops, fusiform vascular ectasia and a "string-of-beads" aspect are typical presentations. • Arterial dissection, aneurysm and subarachnoid haemorrhage are less typical radiologic presentations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Other 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,356,154
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#197
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,238
of 278,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.