| Title |
Independent Choices and the Interpretation of IF Logic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, June 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1015542413718 |
| Authors |
Theo M.V. Janssen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 4 | 33% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#21
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,701
of 126,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Logic, Language and Information
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them