↓ Skip to main content

Emotion selectively impairs associative memory

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Emotion selectively impairs associative memory
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-10-s1-p341
Authors

Christopher R Madan, Christine SM Lau, Jeremy B Caplan, Esther Fujiwara

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 15%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Design 2 15%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#374
of 1,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,178
of 110,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.