↓ Skip to main content

Diviner Lunar Radiometer Observations of Cold Traps in the Moon’s South Polar Region

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
394 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diviner Lunar Radiometer Observations of Cold Traps in the Moon’s South Polar Region
Published in
Science, October 2010
DOI 10.1126/science.1187726
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Paige, Matthew A. Siegler, Jo Ann Zhang, Paul O. Hayne, Emily J. Foote, Kristen A. Bennett, Ashwin R. Vasavada, Benjamin T. Greenhagen, John T. Schofield, Daniel J. McCleese, Marc C. Foote, Eric DeJong, Bruce G. Bills, Wayne Hartford, Bruce C. Murray, Carlton C. Allen, Kelly Snook, Laurence A. Soderblom, Simon Calcutt, Fredric W. Taylor, Neil E. Bowles, Joshua L. Bandfield, Richard Elphic, Rebecca Ghent, Timothy D. Glotch, Michael B. Wyatt, Paul G. Lucey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 178 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Master 27 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 36 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 62 32%
Physics and Astronomy 40 21%
Engineering 27 14%
Chemistry 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 43 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,147,704
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#20,517
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,569
of 113,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#71
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.