| Title |
Application of catheter-tip i.s.f.e.t. for continuousin vivo measurement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, November 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02441899 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Shimada, M. Yano, K. Shibatani, Y. Komoto, M. Esashi, T. Matsuo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 56% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 1994.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#57
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410
of 6,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them