| Title |
Photosensitizing furocoumarins: Interaction with DNA and photo-inactivation of DNA containing viruses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 1965
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02136362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Musajo, G. Rodighiero, G. Colombo, V. Torlone, F. Dall'Acqua |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 1995.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,185
of 5,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384
of 10,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them