↓ Skip to main content

Counterexamples to parsimony and BIC

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 110)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Counterexamples to parsimony and BIC
Published in
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, September 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00053369
Authors

David F. Findley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Psychology 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#23
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,820
of 16,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them