↓ Skip to main content

Additive effects of dihydralazine during enflurane or isoflurane hypotensive anaesthesia for spinal fusion

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Additive effects of dihydralazine during enflurane or isoflurane hypotensive anaesthesia for spinal fusion
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf03010617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Bourreli, Michel Pinaud, Norbert Passuti, Jean-Pierre Gunst, Jean-Christophe Drouet, Jean-Pierre Remi

Abstract

Sixteen patients (13-38 yr) undergoing spinal fusion for scoliosis under controlled hypotension were studied to determine the haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses to IV dihydralazine (1.0 mg.kg-1) followed by 0.5 and 1 MAC of enflurane or isoflurane. Twenty minutes after dihydralazine administration mean arterial pressure (-20 per cent) and systemic vascular resistance (-50 per cent) decreased, and cardiac index (+57 per cent), heart rate (+37 per cent) and intrapulmonary shunt increased. Plasma renin activity and aldosterone and norepinephrine levels increased. Further decreases in mean arterial pressure and in systemic vascular resistance were observed when 0.5 MAC enflurane or isoflurane were added. With 1 MAC anaesthetic levels a further decrease in mean arterial pressure was observed in both groups, but pressure fell to a lower level with isoflurane than with enflurane (p less than 0.01). The reduction of arterial blood pressure to a level of 50-60 mmHg for three to four hours was easy to control and was free of complications. The preliminary IV administration of dihydralazine allowed a reduced volatile agent concentration which attenuated undesirable haemodynamic effects, in spite of renin and norepinephrine release, and permitted a rapid intraoperative awakening.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Chemistry 2 29%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,392
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,734
of 12,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.