| Title |
Reducing the pain of childhood vaccination: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.101720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Taddio, Mary Appleton, Robert Bortolussi, Christine Chambers, Vinita Dubey, Scott Halperin, Anita Hanrahan, Moshe Ipp, Donna Lockett, Noni MacDonald, Deana Midmer, Patricia Mousmanis, Valerie Palda, Karen Pielak, Rebecca Pillai Riddell, Michael Rieder, Jeffrey Scott, Vibhuti Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 21% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 24% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#397,044
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#696
of 9,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,529
of 188,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.