| Title |
Bioavailability of chromium(III)-supplements in rats and humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMetals, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10534-012-9571-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels Laschinsky, Karin Kottwitz, Barbara Freund, Bernd Dresow, Roland Fischer, Peter Nielsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,700,643
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#80
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,694
of 163,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them