| Title |
Tracing the origin of the panda’s thumb
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00114-015-1286-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Abella, Alejandro Pérez-Ramos, Alberto Valenciano, David M. Alba, Marcos D. Ercoli, Daniel Hontecillas, Plinio Montoya, Jorge Morales |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 80% |
| Scientists | 8 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#664,646
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#83
of 2,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,484
of 281,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.