↓ Skip to main content

The association between internet addiction and disordered eating attitudes among Turkish high school students

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
The association between internet addiction and disordered eating attitudes among Turkish high school students
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40519-015-0197-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmet Hamdi Alpaslan, Uğur Koçak, Kadriye Avci, Hanife Uzel Taş

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to investigate the prevalence of disordered eating attitudes (DEAs) and internet addiction (IA) among a non-clinical sample of adolescents and to investigate the relationship between IA, DEAs, and selected socio-demographic characteristics. A total of 584 adolescents (34.8 % n = 203 males and 65.2 % n = 381 females) completed three instruments: the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26), the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), and a socio-demographic questionnaire. It was found that 15.2 % (n = 89) of the participants have DEAs, and IA was detected in 10.1 % (n = 59) of the participants. There was a statistically significant difference between the IA and non-IA groups in terms of body mass index (χ (2) = 10.31, p < 0.01). We found a significant positive correlation between the IAT and EAT-26 scores (r = 0.34, p < 0.01). The presence of DEAs, male gender, and high BMI were found to be the strongest predictor variables of IA. IA and DEAs are relatively frequent phenomena among young students in Turkey. Future studies should attempt to determine the predictive factors by identifying the causal relations between IA and DEAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Psychology 25 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 49 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#13,536,376
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#411
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,035
of 269,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.