| Title |
Revisiting the clinical anatomy of the alar ligaments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2496-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter G. Osmotherly, Darren A. Rivett, Susan R. Mercer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 34% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,152
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,000
of 189,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.