↓ Skip to main content

LSD Lion loses to M.I.T. Mauler

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric Quarterly, March 1968
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
LSD Lion loses to M.I.T. Mauler
Published in
Psychiatric Quarterly, March 1968
DOI 10.1007/bf01563956
Authors

Bud Collins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#214
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#516
of 2,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them