↓ Skip to main content

Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00384-015-2253-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. F. Sier, L. van Gelder, D. T. Ubbink, W. A. Bemelman, R. J. Oostenbroek

Abstract

Although stoma closure is considered a simple surgical intervention, the interval between construction and reversal is often prolonged, and some ileostomies may never be reversed. We evaluated possible predictors for non-reversal and prolonged interval between construction and reversal. In a cohort study of ileostomy patients treated in a large teaching hospital, we collected data from the surgical complication and enterostomal therapists' registries between January 2001 and December 2011. Parameters responsible for morbidity, mortality, length of stay and time interval between construction and reversal were analysed. Of 485 intentionally temporary ileostomies, 359 were reversed after a median of 5.6 months (IQR 3.8-8.9 months), while 126 (26 %) remained permanent. End ileostomy and intra-abdominal abscess independently delayed reversal. Age, end ileostomy, higher body mass index and preoperative radiotherapy were independent factors for non-reversal. Median duration of hospitalisation for reversal was 7.0 days (5-13 days). Morbidity and mortality were 31 and 0.9 %, respectively. In 20 patients (5.5 %), re-ileostomy was necessary. A substantial number of ileostomies that are intended to be temporary will never be reversed. If reversed, the interval between construction and reversal is longer than anticipated, while morbidity after reversal and duration of hospitalisation are considerable. Besides a temporary ileostomy, there are two other options: no diversion or a permanent colostomy. Shared decision-making is to be preferred in these situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Engineering 3 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,278,422
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#1,427
of 1,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,515
of 266,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#29
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.