↓ Skip to main content

Structural and morphological characterization of mullitic substrates obtained by dry-pressing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, March 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Structural and morphological characterization of mullitic substrates obtained by dry-pressing
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, March 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00540454
Authors

G. Celotti, L. Morettini

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 1989.
All research outputs
#4,764,253
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#295
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#943
of 8,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.