↓ Skip to main content

Promotion of flowering in apple trees with gibberellin A4 and C-3 epi-gibberellin A4

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, August 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Promotion of flowering in apple trees with gibberellin A4 and C-3 epi-gibberellin A4
Published in
Planta, August 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00395054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman E. Looney, Richard P. Pharis, Masana Noma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 73%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 1988.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#674
of 2,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,629
of 9,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.