↓ Skip to main content

Genome sequence of the pattern forming Paenibacillus vortex bacterium reveals potential for thriving in complex environments

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome sequence of the pattern forming Paenibacillus vortex bacterium reveals potential for thriving in complex environments
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-710
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Sirota-Madi, Tsviya Olender, Yael Helman, Colin Ingham, Ina Brainis, Dalit Roth, Efrat Hagi, Leonid Brodsky, Dena Leshkowitz, Vladimir Galatenko, Vladimir Nikolaev, Raja C Mugasimangalam, Sharron Bransburg-Zabary, David L Gutnick, Doron Lancet, Eshel Ben-Jacob

Abstract

The pattern-forming bacterium Paenibacillus vortex is notable for its advanced social behavior, which is reflected in development of colonies with highly intricate architectures. Prior to this study, only two other Paenibacillus species (Paenibacillus sp. JDR-2 and Paenibacillus larvae) have been sequenced. However, no genomic data is available on the Paenibacillus species with pattern-forming and complex social motility. Here we report the de novo genome sequence of this Gram-positive, soil-dwelling, sporulating bacterium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
Netherlands 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 84 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Engineering 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 10 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#727,812
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#94
of 10,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,103
of 171,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.