↓ Skip to main content

CTCF/cohesin-binding sites are frequently mutated in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
53 X users
patent
13 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
385 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
561 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CTCF/cohesin-binding sites are frequently mutated in cancer
Published in
Nature Genetics, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/ng.3335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riku Katainen, Kashyap Dave, Esa Pitkänen, Kimmo Palin, Teemu Kivioja, Niko Välimäki, Alexandra E Gylfe, Heikki Ristolainen, Ulrika A Hänninen, Tatiana Cajuso, Johanna Kondelin, Tomas Tanskanen, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Heikki Järvinen, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Anna Lepistö, Eevi Kaasinen, Outi Kilpivaara, Sari Tuupanen, Martin Enge, Jussi Taipale, Lauri A Aaltonen

Abstract

Cohesin is present in almost all active enhancer regions, where it is associated with transcription factors. Cohesin frequently colocalizes with CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor), affecting genomic stability, expression and epigenetic homeostasis. Cohesin subunits are mutated in cancer, but CTCF/cohesin-binding sites (CBSs) in DNA have not been examined for mutations. Here we report frequent mutations at CBSs in cancers displaying a mutational signature where mutations in A•T base pairs predominate. Integration of whole-genome sequencing data from 213 colorectal cancer (CRC) samples and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-exo) data identified frequent point mutations at CBSs. In contrast, CRCs showing an ultramutator phenotype caused by defects in the exonuclease domain of DNA polymerase ɛ (POLE) displayed significantly fewer mutations at and adjacent to CBSs. Analysis of public data showed that multiple cancer types accumulate CBS mutations. CBSs are a major mutational hotspot in the noncoding cancer genome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 1%
United States 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 535 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 161 29%
Researcher 101 18%
Student > Master 65 12%
Student > Bachelor 55 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 6%
Other 64 11%
Unknown 81 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 208 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 6%
Computer Science 17 3%
Physics and Astronomy 7 1%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 84 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#637,558
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,234
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,091
of 283,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#24
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.