↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Commentary: do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? We are on the way
Published in
Oecologia, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2126-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald Jurasinski, Marian Koch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 11 6%
United States 4 2%
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Peru 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 160 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 24%
Researcher 42 22%
Student > Master 22 12%
Professor 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 57%
Environmental Science 41 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 24 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,719
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,386
of 132,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.