↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Commentary: Do we have a consistent terminology for species diversity? The fallacy of true diversity
Published in
Oecologia, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2124-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Root Gorelick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 6%
Spain 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Peru 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 162 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Student > Master 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 16 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 61%
Environmental Science 34 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 21 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,960
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,783
of 145,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.