↓ Skip to main content

Review of mental health promotion interventions in schools

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
665 Mendeley
Title
Review of mental health promotion interventions in schools
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00127-018-1530-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle O’Reilly, Nadzeya Svirydzenka, Sarah Adams, Nisha Dogra

Abstract

The prevalence of mental disorders amongst children and adolescents is an increasing global problem. Schools have been positioned at the forefront of promoting positive mental health and well-being through implementing evidence-based interventions. The aim of this paper is to review current evidence-based research of mental health promotion interventions in schools and examine the reported effectiveness to identify those interventions that can support current policy and ensure that limited resources are appropriately used. The authors reviewed the current state of knowledge on school mental health promotion interventions globally. Two major databases, SCOPUS and ERIC were utilised to capture the social science, health, arts and humanities, and education literature. Initial searches identified 25 articles reporting on mental health promotion interventions in schools. When mapped against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 10 studies were included and explored. Three of these were qualitative and seven were quantitative. A range of interventions have been tested for mental health promotion in schools in the last decade with variable degrees of success. Our review demonstrates that there is still a need for a stronger and broader evidence base in the field of mental health promotion, which should focus on both universal work and targeted approaches to fully address mental health in our young populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 665 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 665 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 13%
Student > Bachelor 71 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Researcher 30 5%
Other 98 15%
Unknown 279 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 115 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 11%
Social Sciences 67 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 7%
Computer Science 11 2%
Other 62 9%
Unknown 292 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#731,971
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#123
of 2,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,978
of 340,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#5
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.