↓ Skip to main content

Marathon Cardiac Deaths

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Marathon Cardiac Deaths
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan S. Tunstall Pedoe

Abstract

Data from the London Marathon, with 650,000 completed runs, show that cardiac arrests occur even in the most experienced runners. Although coronary artery disease was the commonest cause of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) with five deaths and six resuscitations, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or idiopathic left ventricular hypertrophy (HCM) was diagnosed at autopsy on three occasions. HCM deaths had the same average age as the runners with ischaemic heart disease who had SCA or sudden cardiac death. The cardiac arrests were at the finish in less than one-third of cases and the remainder occurred between 6 and 26 miles on the course. Only one of the eight runners who died had reported symptoms to his family or physician suggestive of cardiac disease. The runner who had reported pre-race angina pain was investigated with a negative exercise stress test prior to the marathon and despite this died with a left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. The cardiac death rate for the London Marathon is 1 in 80,000 finishers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 48%
Psychology 4 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#907,466
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#809
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,686
of 285,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#72
of 525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.