↓ Skip to main content

Sample preparation of YBa2Cu3O7−δ for high-resolution electron microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, March 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 344)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Sample preparation of YBa2Cu3O7−δ for high-resolution electron microscopy
Published in
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, March 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00617948
Authors

H. W. Zandbergen, C. Hetherington, R. Gronsky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 1990.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
#41
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,612
of 12,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them