Title |
Group leadership depends on energetic state in a nomadic collective foraging caterpillar
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00265-011-1167-5 |
Authors |
Melanie McClure, Melissa Ralph, Emma Despland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 72% |
Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,310,519
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#426
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,979
of 110,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.