↓ Skip to main content

Proliferation is the strongest prognosticator in node-negative breast cancer: significance, error sources, alternatives and comparison with molecular prognostic markers

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Proliferation is the strongest prognosticator in node-negative breast cancer: significance, error sources, alternatives and comparison with molecular prognostic markers
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10549-008-0126-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan P. A. Baak, Einar Gudlaugsson, Ivar Skaland, Lydia Hui Ru Guo, Jan Klos, Tone Hoel Lende, Håvard Søiland, Emiel A. M. Janssen, Axel zur Hausen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Computer Science 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,658
of 4,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,818
of 81,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.